Recently in Geiszler and Froines Category
If my mom can't be declared incompetent, then she should be portrayed as a criminal. That's what the justice system is for, right? To ruin people's lives through civil and criminal conspiracy. To keep completely baseless law suits alive through the collusion of unethical attorneys until all options to wrest their property, livelihood or reputations from their control have been extinguished. That's what the taxpayers want from their District courtrooms.
It seems to be a very Rovian technique, accusing your opponent of what you have done. And we seem to have stumbled upon another of those efforts in the midst of this construction lien law suit that has been a pretext to steal property, drain time and resources, discredit, and declare incompetence (Mr. Geiszler told my mother's first attorney, at one of their first meetings that he planned to subpoena her medical records -- in a construction lien case that she was defending herself against). After most of those efforts failed, we now believe that this latest attempt was to try to make it appear as though my mother was engaged in civil conspiracy instead of... the numerous individuals working together to make it appear that way.
If my mother was the criminal mastermind, rather than David Ryan, then he and John Boyle would be off the hook for attempting to take over her property without her permission? And then Loken and the scores of others who have taken part in this absurd and epic effort to devalue the property and harass us wouldn't be in the wrong? All the legal malpractice that was committed would be nullified? Because rather than hapless victims trying to improve property and live productive lives, we would be the perpetrators then. Oh, how simple for everyone.
It seems to be a very Rovian technique, accusing your opponent of what you have done. And we seem to have stumbled upon another of those efforts in the midst of this construction lien law suit that has been a pretext to steal property, drain time and resources, discredit, and declare incompetence (Mr. Geiszler told my mother's first attorney, at one of their first meetings that he planned to subpoena her medical records -- in a construction lien case that she was defending herself against). After most of those efforts failed, we now believe that this latest attempt was to try to make it appear as though my mother was engaged in civil conspiracy instead of... the numerous individuals working together to make it appear that way.
If my mother was the criminal mastermind, rather than David Ryan, then he and John Boyle would be off the hook for attempting to take over her property without her permission? And then Loken and the scores of others who have taken part in this absurd and epic effort to devalue the property and harass us wouldn't be in the wrong? All the legal malpractice that was committed would be nullified? Because rather than hapless victims trying to improve property and live productive lives, we would be the perpetrators then. Oh, how simple for everyone.
Continue reading Loken Builders' (and Friends') Neverending Abuse of the Legal System.
Tim Geiszler of Missoula's Geiszler and Froines is priceless. The minutiae of these peoples' ploys is so incredible. That people are paid or volunteer to sit around thinking of the tiniest ways to discredit my mom astounds me. I always have to wonder how many people this is happening to.
So, the Geiszler/Loken camp is in a desperate full court press to convince Judge Deschamps to convene a completely unprecedented and uncalled for competency hearing. Apparently in order to back up his claim that Mom is unreliable or incompetent, Geiszler does the pettiest little thing.
He files a motion with the court to extend the deadline for the settlement conference the judge has ordered. Only, he says that he's tried to contact Mom regarding the rescheduling but she didn't respond. He files the motion with the description of her non-response on Thursday, and on that same Thursday afternoon sends Mom the email asking her if she minds rescheduling. Obviously, she couldn't respond after Geiszler had already filed something saying she didn't.
So he's lied. In a court filing. About something so stupid and little. He clearly doesn't mind lying. I guess if you're willing to try to wrest control of someone's life away from her for strategic reasons, your professional ethics don't dissuade you from lying in court documents.
This is the kind of petty ridiculousness we deal with -- it's also very instructive. This is how people are discredited and their lives ruined. Little by little. A tiny lie here, and a tiny lie there, and a few big lies thrown in, and suddenly you have what seems like community-wide consensus about someone's character or, in this case, competency.
I would wager that Geiszler thought that his little lie would slip through without rebuttal. He would think that because he would assume that our new attorney would start filing immediately and he would be reasonably confident that that attorney would not want to dispute Mr. Geiszler's representation. He would assume that our new attorney would go along with the incompetence narrative. Because previous attorneys have gone along with Mr. Geiszler's narratives.
And there it would be as evidence: See, the Defendant can't function on her own -- she can't even respond to simple email requests.
Sorry, Mr. Geiszler. The tricks you learned in whatever Sleazy Lawyer Guild you belong to can't work forever. Now your silly, little email is part of the public record along with your silly, little lie of a filing. Congratulations -- the Montana Bar should be proud to have you.
~~
So, the Geiszler/Loken camp is in a desperate full court press to convince Judge Deschamps to convene a completely unprecedented and uncalled for competency hearing. Apparently in order to back up his claim that Mom is unreliable or incompetent, Geiszler does the pettiest little thing.
He files a motion with the court to extend the deadline for the settlement conference the judge has ordered. Only, he says that he's tried to contact Mom regarding the rescheduling but she didn't respond. He files the motion with the description of her non-response on Thursday, and on that same Thursday afternoon sends Mom the email asking her if she minds rescheduling. Obviously, she couldn't respond after Geiszler had already filed something saying she didn't.
So he's lied. In a court filing. About something so stupid and little. He clearly doesn't mind lying. I guess if you're willing to try to wrest control of someone's life away from her for strategic reasons, your professional ethics don't dissuade you from lying in court documents.
This is the kind of petty ridiculousness we deal with -- it's also very instructive. This is how people are discredited and their lives ruined. Little by little. A tiny lie here, and a tiny lie there, and a few big lies thrown in, and suddenly you have what seems like community-wide consensus about someone's character or, in this case, competency.
I would wager that Geiszler thought that his little lie would slip through without rebuttal. He would think that because he would assume that our new attorney would start filing immediately and he would be reasonably confident that that attorney would not want to dispute Mr. Geiszler's representation. He would assume that our new attorney would go along with the incompetence narrative. Because previous attorneys have gone along with Mr. Geiszler's narratives.
And there it would be as evidence: See, the Defendant can't function on her own -- she can't even respond to simple email requests.
Sorry, Mr. Geiszler. The tricks you learned in whatever Sleazy Lawyer Guild you belong to can't work forever. Now your silly, little email is part of the public record along with your silly, little lie of a filing. Congratulations -- the Montana Bar should be proud to have you.
~~
